Re: How can we make beta testing better?
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How can we make beta testing better? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 536D17F3.9040406@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | How can we make beta testing better? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/26/2014 12:39 PM, Jim Nasby wrote: > On 4/17/14, 6:42 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: >> So we have some software we've been procrastinating on OSS'ing, which >> does: >> >> 1) Takes full query CSV logs from a running postgres instance >> 2) Runs them against a target instance in parallel >> 3) Records response times for all queries > > Is that the stuff you'd worked on for us forever ago? I thought that was > just pgreplay based, but now I don't remember. Yes. It's based around the same principles as pgreplay -- a replay from logs -- but used python and multiprocess to allow for much higher levels of concurrency as well as not completely halting due to deadlock errors. However, this is all a bit of a tangent. While we want to give users better tools for testing, we also need some reasonable way to get them *involved* in testing. That's the main thing I was looking for feedback on. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: