Re: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 536BEF10.9010303@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals? (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?
Re: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/08/2014 04:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >> Here is what I do on my FreeBSD VM. I have 2 animals, nightjar and >> friarbird. They have the same buildroot. friarbird is set up to >> build with CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS, building just HEAD and just testing >> C locale; nightjar builds all branches we are interested in and >> tests locale cs_CZ.utf8 in addition to C. > So nightjar would build frequently almost all the time, but as soon as > friarbird is doing a CLOBBER run nightjar would just stop running? That > seems a bit odd, given that the CLOBBER runs take a lot longer than > non-CLOBBER ones. (I guess it makes sense if you don't want to devote > double CPU time now and then to running the CLOBBER animal, but other > than that there doesn't seem to be a point to setting it up like that.) > Why? This was actually discussed when I set this up and Tom opined that a once a day run with CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS was plenty. It takes about 4 /12 hours. The rest of the time nightjar runs. friarbird runs a bit after midnight US East Coast time, which is generally a slowish time for commits, so not running nightjar at that time seems perfectly reasonable. I really don't get what your objection to the setup is. And no, I don't want them to run concurrently, I'd rather spread out the cycles. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: