Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses

On 05/06/2014 05:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> On 2014-05-06 09:37:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Sorry, it is *way* too late for 9.4.
>
>> It's imo a regression/oversight introduced in the pg_lsn patch. Not a
>> new feature.
>
> You can argue that if you like, but it doesn't matter.  It's too late for
> a change as big as that for such an inessential feature.  We are in the
> stabilization game at this point, and adding features is not the thing to
> be doing.

FWIW, I agree with Andres that this would be a reasonable thing to add. 
Exactly the kind of oversight that we should be fixing at this stage in 
the release cycle.

- Heikki