On 26.4.2014 06:47, tcoq wrote:
> I now did some more tests e.g. driver update new connectionpool but
> still the same problem. So I decidet to print and switch to single
> inserts if batch was failed.
>
> It seems to be that I did not have a problem, when I switch to
> single-insterts so it is not a problem of the data. Now I believe it
> is a problem for the combination of colum/batchsize.
>
> Did anyone know a limitation e.g. on JDBC size of limitations?
So, what connection pool(s) are you using?
Can you prepare a self-contained test case?
regards
Tomas