Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 535C09EA.9060500@nasby.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD (Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/22/14, 5:01 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > Hey folks, I just spoke with our director of netops Tom Sparks here at Norse and we have a vested interest in Postgresql. We can throw together a cluster of 4 machines with specs approximately in the range of dual quad core westmerewith ~64GB of ram running FreeBSD 10 or 11. We can also do an Ubungu install as well or other Linux distro. Pleaselet me know if that this would be a something that the project could make use of please. > > We also have colo space and power, etc. So this would be the whole deal. The cluster would be up for as long as needed. > > Are the machine specs sufficient? Any other things we should look for? > > CC'd Tom on this email. Did anyone respond to this off-list? Would these machines be more useful as dedicated performance test servers for the community or generic BenchFarm members? -- Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect jim@nasby.net 512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: