Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 535789CA.8040707@2ndQuadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/23/2014 08:11 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: > We start with a database called Postgres and a schema called Public. > Yet we don't start up with any usable tables. > > I propose we add a single table called Postgres when we Initdb > > CREATE TABLE Postgres (Id Integer, Data Jsonb); > COMMENT ON TABLE Postgres IS 'Single table for quick start usage - > design your database'; > > The purpose of this is to make the database immediately usable. With default access controls it still aint :( And most of complaints I have heard are about the need of fidgeting with pg_hba.conf to get *anything* started. So maybe we could start with something like this at the end of initdb: > createdb example > psql example sample# create table stuff(id serial primary key, data jsonb); sample# grant all on stuff to public; And also have the following lines in pg_hba.conf for it local all all trust host all all 127.0.0.1/32 trust host all all ::1/128 trust This would solve most of the frustration with starting pg development for newcomers Cheers Hannu > By > including this table in the default initdb it will mean that programs > can rely on the existence of this table and begin working quicker. > > By now, some of you will be doubled over laughing as if this is an > April fool joke. I don't mean it to be at all. > > The idea is to have a stupidly obvious and easy table that will > potentially be usable by just about everyone, in any language. > > If you don't like it, don't use it. If you really dislike it, drop it. > > But for new people coming to Postgres, they will have a data object to > access and begin using the database immediately. Their code will work, > their examples will work. OK, so they need to go back and think about > the design, but at least they got it to work and will be encouraged to > do more. > > Remember when we didn't have a database called Postgres? Remember how > much simpler life is now? Remember that now. > > We can also insert a single row, Id = 0 with "Postgres sample data" in > it, but that seems a step too far. > -- Hannu Krosing PostgreSQL Consultant Performance, Scalability and High Availability 2ndQuadrant Nordic OÜ
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: