shm_mq inconsistent behavior of SHM_MQ_DETACHED
От | Petr Jelinek |
---|---|
Тема | shm_mq inconsistent behavior of SHM_MQ_DETACHED |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 535674B4.2040706@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: shm_mq inconsistent behavior of SHM_MQ_DETACHED
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, I was playing with shm_mq and found a little odd behavior with detaching after sending messages. Following sequence behaves as expected (receiver gets 2 messages): P1 -> set_sender P1 -> attach P2 -> set_receiver P2 -> attach P1 -> send P2 -> receive P1 -> send P1 -> detach P2 -> receive P2 -> detach But if I do first receive after detach like in this sequence: P1 -> set_sender P1 -> attach P2 -> set_receiver P2 -> attach P1 -> send P1 -> send P1 -> detach P2 -> receive I get SHM_MQ_DETACHED on the receiver even though there are messages in the ring buffer. The reason for this behavior is that mqh_counterparty_attached is only set by shm_mq_receive. This does not seem to be consistent - I would either expect to get SHM_MQ_DETACHED always when other party has detached or always get all remaining messages that are in queue (and I would strongly prefer the latter). Maybe the shm_mq_get_bytes_written should be used to determine if there is something left for us to read in the receiver if we hit the !mqh_counterparty_attached code path with detached sender? -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: