Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD

On 22/04/14 09:25, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-04-21 17:21:20 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 02:08:51PM -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
>>> If the community had more *BSD presence I think it would be great
>>> but it isn't all that viable at this point. I do know however that
>>> no-one in this community would turn down a team of FreeBSD advocates
>>> helping us make PostgreSQL awesome for PostgreSQL.
>>
>> I don't think we would even implement a run-time control for Linux or
>> Windows for this, so I don't even think it is a FreeBSD issue.
>
> I think some of the arguments in this thread are pretty damn absurd. We
> have just introduced dynamic_shared_memory_type.
>

+1

I was just thinking the same thing...