Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
От | Alfred Perlstein |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 53554AD9.3040408@freebsd.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/21/14 9:38 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > On 04/21/2014 12:25 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >> >>>> >>> >>> 1. OS developers are not the target audience for GUCs. If the OS >>> developers want to test and can't be botherrd with building with a >>> couple of different parameters then I'm not very impressed. >>> >>> 2. We should be trying to get rid of GUCs where possible, and only >>> add them when we must. The more there are the more we confuse users. >>> If a packager can pick a default surely they can pick build options >>> too. >> Thank you for the lecture Andrew! Really pleasant way to treat a >> user and a fan of the system. :) >> >> > > I confess to being mightily confused. Sure, to clarify: Andrew, you just told someone who in a db stack sits both below (as a pgsql user 15 years) and above (as a FreeBSD kernel dev 15 years) your software what they "really need". -Alfred
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: