Re: DISCARD ALL (Again)
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DISCARD ALL (Again) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 53513E07.4050101@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: DISCARD ALL (Again) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: DISCARD ALL (Again)
Re: DISCARD ALL (Again) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/17/14, 8:24 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > We could in fact implement #2, I imagine, by destroying and recreating > the entire language interpreter. So I could imagine implementing a > "DISCARD INTERPRETERS" kind of command that would zap the current > interpreter(s) for whichever PL languages happened to feel like > cooperating with the command. More generally, any extension could maintain any kind of cross-call state. plproxy, dblink, pgmemcache come to mind. A general hook into DISCARD might be doable, but then it's not clear how to categorize this into DISCARD subcommands.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: