Re: Tuning Postgres for Single connection use
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Tuning Postgres for Single connection use |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 534C796F.7040904@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Tuning Postgres for Single connection use (Nick Eubank <nickeubank@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 04/14/2014 05:46 PM, Nick Eubank wrote: > > Any rules of thumb for |work_mem|, |maintenance_work_mem|, > |shared_buffer|, etc. for a database that DOESN'T anticipate > concurrent connections and that is doing lots of aggregate functions > on large tables? All the advice I can find online on tuning (this > <http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Performance_Optimization>, this > <http://media.revsys.com/talks/djangocon/2011/secrets-of-postgresql-performance.pdf>, > this > <http://www.revsys.com/writings/postgresql-performance.html> etc.) is > written for people anticipating lots of concurrent connections. > > I'm a social scientist looking to use Postgres not as a database to be > shared by multiple users, but rather as my own tool for manipulating a > massive data set (I have 5 billion transaction records (600gb in csv) > and want to pull out unique user pairs, estimate aggregates for > individual users, etc.). This also means almost no writing, except to > creation of new tables based on selections from the main table. > > I'm on a Windows 8 VM with 16gb ram, SCSI VMware HD, and 3 cores if > that's important. > > First up would probably be "don't run on Windows". shared_buffers above 512Mb causes performance to degrade on Windows, while that threshold is much higher on *nix. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: