Re: BUG #9956: Concurrency bug in CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS statement
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #9956: Concurrency bug in CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS statement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 53484895.80209@vmware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #9956: Concurrency bug in CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS statement (christian@schlichtherle.de) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 04/11/2014 05:51 PM, christian@schlichtherle.de wrote: > The following bug has been logged on the website: > > Bug reference: 9956 > Logged by: Christian Schlichtherle > Email address: christian@schlichtherle.de > PostgreSQL version: 9.3.4 > Operating system: Mac OS X 10.9.2 > Description: > > Apparently, the CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS statement is not properly > isolated. The following test exposes the issue using JDBC: > > <pre><code> > ... > </code></pre> > > The result of running this test is always the following exception stack > trace. > > <pre><code> > java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: > ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint > "pg_type_typname_nsp_index" > Detail: Key (typname, typnamespace)=(foo, 2200) already exists. Yeah, that's a known issue. See http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4F9541D3.1000202@beccati.com. It's OK for normal DDL commands to rely on the constraint, but I agree it's pretty surprising for IF NOT EXISTS. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: