Re: efficient way to do "fuzzy" join
От | Andy Colson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: efficient way to do "fuzzy" join |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 534805C5.4020807@squeakycode.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | efficient way to do "fuzzy" join (Rémi Cura <remi.cura@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: efficient way to do "fuzzy" join
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 4/11/2014 7:50 AM, Rémi Cura wrote: > Hey dear List, > > I'm looking for some advice about the best way to perform a "fuzzy" > join, that is joining two table based on approximate matching. > > It is about temporal matching > given a table A with rows containing data and a control_time (for > instance 1 ; 5; 6; .. sec, not necessarly rounded of evenly-spaced) > > given another table B with lines on no precise timing (eg control_time = > 2.3 ; 5.8 ; 6.2 for example) > > How to join every row of B to A based on > min(@(A.control_time-B.control_time)) > (that is, for every row of B, get the row of A that is temporaly the > closest), > in an efficient way? > (to be explicit, 2.3 would match to 1, 5.8 to 6, 6.2 to 6) > > Optionnaly, how to get interpolation efficiently (meaning one has to get > the previous time and next time for 1 st order interpolation, 2 before > and 2 after for 2nd order interpolation, and so on)? > (to be explicit 5.8 would match to 5 and 6, the weight being 0.2 and 0.8 > respectively) > > > Currently my data is spatial so I use Postgis function to interpolate a > point on a line, but is is far from efficient or general, and I don't > have control on interpolation (only the spatial values are interpolated). > > > Cheers, > Rémi-C Have you seen the range type? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/rangetypes.html Not fuzzy, but is indexable. -Andy
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: