Re: Postgres as In-Memory Database?
От | Florian Weimer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres as In-Memory Database? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5342428A.6000506@redhat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres as In-Memory Database? (Stefan Keller <sfkeller@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres as In-Memory Database?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 04/02/2014 12:32 AM, Stefan Keller wrote: > It also mentions an insert-only technique: "This approach has been > adopted before in POSTGRES [21] in 1987 and was called "time-travel". > I would be interested what "time-travel" is and if this is still used by > Postgres. Back in the old days, PostgreSQL never deleted any tuples. Rows were deleted by writing the deletion time into a column. As a result, you could go back to old data just by telling PostgreSQL to report rows which where visible at a given time. Obviously, this approach precluded use of PostgreSQL in many scenarios. For example, you wouldn't want to use it as your web application session store. -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: