Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 533d93c5-f604-8e5f-4a48-975c08c53d59@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction (Sandro Santilli <strk@kbt.io>) |
Ответы |
Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 21.04.23 19:09, Sandro Santilli wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 11:48:51AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> "Regina Obe" <lr@pcorp.us> writes: >> >>> https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/5375 >> >> If they actually are using locale C, I would say this is a bug. >> That should designate memcmp sorting and nothing else. > > Sounds like a bug to me. This is happening with a PostgreSQL cluster > created and served by a build of commit c04c6c5d6f : > > =# select version(); > PostgreSQL 16devel on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Ubuntu 11.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.3.0, 64-bit > =# show lc_collate; > C > =# select '+' < '-'; > f If the database is created with locale provider ICU, then lc_collate does not apply here, so the result might be correct (depending on what locale you have set). > =# select '+' < '-' collate "C"; > t
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: