Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 53386926-08a6-76f7-6a8f-f36e4ffb1b9d@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists
Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/6/19 10:59 PM, David Rowley wrote: > On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 03:16, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> I wonder what should we be doing with this series -- concretely, should >> the effort concentrate on one of the two patches, and leave the other >> for pg13, to increase the chances of the first one being in pg12? I >> would favor that approach, since it's pretty late in the cycle by now >> and it seems dubious that both will be ready. > > I mostly have been reviewing the MCV patch with the thoughts that one > is better than none in PG12. I don't see any particular reason that > we need both in the one release. > I agree with that, although most of the complexity likely lies in integrating the stats into the selectivity estimation - if we get that right for the MCV patch, adding histogram seems comparably simpler. But yeah, let's focus on the MCV part. regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: