Re: psql \d+ and oid display
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql \d+ and oid display |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 53348F23.5060505@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql \d+ and oid display (David Johnston <polobo@yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/27/2014 04:43 PM, David Johnston wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote >> When we made OIDs optional, we added an oid status display to \d+: >> >> test=> \d+ test >> Table "public.test" >> Column | Type | Modifiers | Storage | Stats target | Description >> --------+---------+-----------+---------+--------------+------------- >> x | integer | | plain | | >> --> Has OIDs: no >> >> Do we want to continue displaying that OID line, or make it optional for >> cases where the value doesn't match default_with_oids? > If we didn't make it behave this way at the time of the change then what has > changed that we should make it behave this way now? I like the logic > generally but not necessarily the change. > > The disadvantage of this change is users (both end and tools) of the data > now also have to look at what the default is (or was at the time the text > was generated) to know what a suppressed OIDs means. Given how much > information the typical \d+ generates I would suspect that the added noise > this introduces is quickly ignored by frequent users and not all the > disruptive to those who use \d+ infrequently. Tools likely would prefer is > to be always displayed. > > Frankly, to me it's just useless noise. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: