Re: New parameter RollbackError to control rollback behavior on error
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New parameter RollbackError to control rollback behavior on error |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 533295A0.4010405@vmware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | New parameter RollbackError to control rollback behavior on error (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: New parameter RollbackError to control rollback
behavior on error
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/26/2014 08:39 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > Hi all, > > The behavior of rollback when an error occurs on an handle is > controlled by extending Protocol with "$PROTNUM-[0|1|2]" where: > - 0 = let the application handle rollbacks > - 1 = rollback whole transaction when an error occurs > - 2 = rollback only statement that failed > Using such an extension is somewhat awkward as a single string is used > for two settings... The proposed attached patch adds a new parameter > called RollbackError that allows to control the behavior of rollback > on error with a different parameter. Great! Since we're designing a new user interface for this, let's try to make it as user-friendly as possible: * I'm not too fond of the RollbackError name. It sounds like "an error while rolling back". I googled around and found out that DataDirect's proprietary driver has the same option, and they call it TransactionErrorBehavior. See http://blogs.datadirect.com/2013/07/solution-unexpected-postgres-current-transaction-aborted-error.html. * Instead of using 0-2 as the values, let's give them descriptive names. Something like "none", "RollbackTransaction", "RollbackStatement". (actually, we'll probably want to also allow the integers, to keep the connection string short, as there is a size limit on that) > I thought first about including that in my cleanup work for 9.4, but > as this actually does not break the driver it may be worth adding it > directly to master, explaining the patch attached here. Comments > welcome. Note that if there are objections I do not mind adding that > for the work that would be merged later to 9.4 builds. Yeah, let's get this into the master branch before your big 9.4 cleanup work. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: