Re: pg_dump vs pg_basebackup
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_dump vs pg_basebackup |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5331A6E6.8010503@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_dump vs pg_basebackup (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On 03/25/2014 08:21 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > I would say that's the one thing that rsync is *not*. pg_basebackup > takes care of a lot of things under the hood. rsync is a lot more > complicated, in particular in failure scenarios, since you have to > manually deal with pg_start/stop_backup(). > > There are definitely reasons you'd prefer rsync over pg_basebackup, but > I don't believe simplicity is one of them. > > //Magnus Good God man... since when do you top post! Well there are tools that use rsync to solve those issues :P. We even have one that does multi-threaded rsync so you can pull many Terabytes in very little time (relatively). JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579 PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc Political Correctness is for cowards.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: