Re: Failed Assert in pgstat_assoc_relation
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Failed Assert in pgstat_assoc_relation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 532BDA3B-C183-4ED2-B434-6270B9C443BE@anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Failed Assert in pgstat_assoc_relation (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Failed Assert in pgstat_assoc_relation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On December 1, 2022 9:48:48 PM PST, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: >> On 2022-12-02 00:08:20 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Just the table-to-view hack. I'm not aware that there are any other >>> cases, and it seems hard to credit that there ever will be any. > >> I can see some halfway credible scenarios. E.g. converting a view to a >> matview, or a table into a partition. I kind of wonder if it's worth keeping >> the change, just in case we do - it's not that easy to hit... > >I'd suggest putting in an assertion that the relkind isn't changing, >instead. Sounds like a plan. Will you do that when you remove the table-to-view hack? Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: