Re: jsonb status
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: jsonb status |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 532A3208.6060201@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: jsonb status (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: jsonb status
Re: jsonb status |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/19/2014 06:57 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> * Jsonb vs JsonbValue is just bad, the latter needs to be renamed, and >> there needs to be a very clear explanation about why two forms exist >> and what each is used for. > I've pushed some comments to Github that further clarify the > distinction: https://github.com/feodor/postgres/commit/5835de0b55bdfc02ee59e2affb6ce25995587dc4 > > I did not change the name of JsonbValue, because I sincerely could not > think of a better one. The distinction is subtle. > I didn't like the _state->state stuff either, but I think you changed the wrong name - it's the field name in the struct that needs changing. What you've done is inconsistent with the common idiom in jsonfuncs.c. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: