Re: plpgsql.warn_shadow
От | Petr Jelinek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: plpgsql.warn_shadow |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5328A343.2040506@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: plpgsql.warn_shadow (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: plpgsql.warn_shadow
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 18/03/14 20:45, Pavel Stehule wrote:
2014-03-18 20:44 GMT+01:00 Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>:Thanks, yeah I left that sentence unchanged from original patch, maybe I should remove the word "number" there as it implies that there are a lot of them, but I don't really want to change everything to singular when the input is specified as list.
On 18/03/14 20:36, Pavel Stehule wrote:
<para>
+ To aid the user in finding instances of simple but common problems before
+ they cause harm, <application>PL/PgSQL</> provides a number of additional
+ <replaceable>checks</>. When enabled, depending on the configuration, they
+ can be used to emit either a <literal>WARNING</> or an <literal>ERROR</>
+ during the compilation of a function.
+ </para>
>>>provides a number of additional<<<
There will be only one check in 9.4, so this sentence is confusing and should be reformulated.What about add sentence: in this moment only "shadowed-variables" is available?
There is something like that said 2 paragraphs down the line:
+ The default is <literal>"none"</>. Currently the list of available checks + includes only one: + <variablelist> + <varlistentry> + <term><varname>shadowed-variables</varname></term>
-- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: