Re: Planner hints in Postgresql
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Planner hints in Postgresql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 53277291.2090908@nasby.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Planner hints in Postgresql (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Planner hints in Postgresql
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/17/14, 2:16 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Pavel Stehule<pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: >> >I don't believe so SELECTIVITY can work well too. Slow queries are usually >> >related to some strange points in data. I am thinking so well concept should >> >be based on validity of estimations. Some plans are based on totally wrong >> >estimation, but should be fast due less sensitivity to bad estimations. So >> >well concept is penalization some risk plans - or use brute force - like >> >COLUMN store engine does. Their plan is usually simply and tolerant to bad >> >estimations. > Disagree. There is a special case of slow query where problem is not > with the data but with the expression over the data; something in the > query defeats sampled selectivity. Common culprits are: > > *) CASE expressions > *) COALESCE > *) casts > *) simple tranformational expressions > *) predicate string concatenation *) time/date functions, ie WHERE date_trunc( 'quarter', some_timestamp ) = '2014-1-1' Though, in this case it's probably much better to teach the parser how to turn that into a range expression. -- Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect jim@nasby.net 512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: