Re: Torn page hazard in ginRedoUpdateMetapage()
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Torn page hazard in ginRedoUpdateMetapage() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5320198C.2090207@vmware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Torn page hazard in ginRedoUpdateMetapage() (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Torn page hazard in ginRedoUpdateMetapage()
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/10/2014 09:44 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: >> When GIN changes a metapage, we WAL-log its ex-header content and never use a >> backup block. This reduces WAL volume since the vast majority of the metapage >> is unused. However, ginRedoUpdateMetapage() only restores the WAL-logged >> content if the metapage LSN predates the WAL record LSN. If a metapage write >> tore and updated the LSN but not the other content, we would fail to complete >> the update. Instead, unconditionally reinitialize the metapage similar to how >> _bt_restore_meta() handles the situation. >> >> I found this problem by code reading and did not attempt to build a test case >> illustrating its practical consequences. It's possible that there's no >> problem in practice on account of some reason I haven't contemplated. > > The attached patch doesn't apply any more, but it looks like this > issue still exists. Fixed. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: