Re: jsonb and nested hstore
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: jsonb and nested hstore |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 531DD145.20801@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: jsonb and nested hstore (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: jsonb and nested hstore
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/10/2014 05:18 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> OK, it sounds like the adjustments are minimal, like not using the >> high-order bit. > Attached patch is a refinement of the work of Oleg, Teodor and Andrew. > Revisions are mostly my own, although Andrew contributed too. > > Changes include: > > * Extensive relocation, and moderate restructuring of code. Many > comments added, while many existing comments were copy-edited. Nothing > remains in contrib. jsonb is a distinct, in-core type with no > user-visible relationship to hstore. There is no code dependency > between the two. The amount of code redundancy this turned out to > create (between jsonb and an unchanged hstore) is, in my estimation, > quite acceptable. > > * B-Tree and hash operator classes for the core type are included. A > GiST operator class, and two GIN operator classes are also included. > Obviously this is where I spent most time by far. > > * Everything else that was in hstore in the last revision (the > complement of the hstore2 opclasses) is removed entirely. The patch is > much smaller. If we just consider code (excluding tests and > documentation), the diffstat seems far more manageable: > > Thanks for your work on this. It's just occurred to me that we'll need to add hstore_to_jsonb functions and a cast to match the hstore_to_json functions and cast. That should be fairly simple - I'll work on that. It need not hold up progress with what's in this patch. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: