Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL RPM Yum repository is available]
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL RPM Yum repository is available] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 530B3FB9300DBC7A3DEEDC8A@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL RPM Yum repository is available] (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL RPM Yum repository is
available]
|
Список | pgsql-www |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --On Wednesday, January 09, 2008 09:37:00 +0100 Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > If that's so, then that's the problem. Because the first copy of this email > was received *way* earlier than that. As in right after it was sent. Maybe > you can get a bunch of the original headers fromt he MBOX files in the > archives? (they have only one copy of it, but I'll bet it shows a > completely different delivery time) The archives would only have one copy ... its after it was written to the archives that anything would have been duplicated ... > Who generates the messageid? Devrim? majordomo? maia? Because I only see that > exact messageid once (not ESMTP id here, actual message id > "1199744552.30375.57.camel@localhost.localdomain") only shows up once in my > logs. So the different copies of the mail was delivered with different > messageids. To the best of my knowledge, the message id its is generated by Devrim's system ... in fact, if you look at the headers of this 'thread', you will also see a References header which is the message ids of other messages in this thread: References: <4783956A.9060800@commandprompt.com> <200801080726.32233.josh@agliodbs.com> <20080108154021.GJ25881@svr2.hagander.net> <C522C01EE1A0A98ECCF6D5C4@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 And, from the message I'm responding to: Message-ID: <20080109083700.GA25870@svr2.hagander.net> Notice that your domain name is in the @ part? Now, I'm not 100% certain what happens if someone *re-injected* the message, but suspect it would end up with a new message id .. which *could* explain what happened (if we had headers to check) ... there are multiple moderators for the list, so if someone re-injected the message a few times, th emoderators could have re-approved each one without realizing they were doing it ... ... but, that woudln't explain why JoshB or I received multiple copies, just you and JD, so I don't really consider that one a high probability, just low possibility ... in fact, very low possibility, as we shoudl then see multiple copies in the archives ... - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQFHhL914QvfyHIvDvMRAuOIAJiWbXw2fuVrjvfZp3QR992YId5RAJ4iDT8Q XaOnvrmPk+veyRjPRaXzlg== =ecci -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: