Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

On 09/02/2014 14:10, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 02/09/2014 01:12 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/02/2014 00:06, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/08/2014 05:34 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
>>>>> Though I'm not a MINGW expert at all, I know dllwrap is a deprecated
>>>>> tool and dlltool is almost a deprecated tool. Cygwin port is removing
>>>>> the use of dllwrap and dlltool now. Isn't it better for MINGW port to
>>>>> follow it?
>>>> Only way to make that happen is to prepare and test a patch ...
>>>
>>> Yeah. Incidentally, we didn't quite get rid of dlltool for Cygwin. We
>>> did get rid of dllwrap. But I agree this is worth trying for Mingw.
>>>
>>
>> we should have get rid of dlltool on cygwin.
>> At least it is not used on my build
>>
>> Regards
>> Marco
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> The send in a patch. The patch you sent in previously did not totally
> remove it IIRC.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>


attached patch versus latest git.

except prepared_xacts test all others are fine
=======================
  All 140 tests passed.
=======================

Regards
Marco