Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 52F13CF6.4000403@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/04/2014 10:53 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: >> On 02/04/2014 09:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> My own opinion is that I've already wasted untold man-hours thanks to >>> the random porting problems induced by Windows, a platform that I never >>> have and never will care about personally. I will *not* spend my own >>> time doing tests that someone else could do. If we can't get some >>> effort contributed by someone who does use that platform, I'm personally >>> prepared to declare the entire damn thing no longer supported. > >> Although that is obviously your prerogative it is important to remember >> that Windows is easily the second most used version of PostgreSQL out >> there (behind Linux). > > [ shrug... ] If it's so widely used, why is it so hard to find somebody > who's willing to put in some development effort for it? Well, from what I have seen of the Windows world there is a fairly sharp demarcation between users and developers. So use does not necessarily mean developer knowledge. > > regards, tom lane > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@gmail.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: