Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 52F1101C.2060900@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/04/2014 10:43 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> On 2014-02-04 02:10:47 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Meh. It might be that the DateStyle usage in postgres_fdw would >>> accidentally fail to malfunction if it saw a bogus value of the variable. >>> But it's hard to believe that this would be true of MainLWLockArray. >> There's not that much lwlock usage in contrib. It's just >> pg_stat_statements and pg_buffercache. Neither has tests... So it very >> well could be that breakage simply hasn't been observed. > Hm, you're right --- I'd have thought there were more of those. > > Ugh. This problem was bad enough when I thought that it would only lead > to link-time errors detectable in the buildfarm. If it can lead to errors > only observable at runtime --- and maybe not obvious even then --- then > I think we *have to* do something about it. By that I mean that we must > get rid of the need to manually plaster PGDLLIMPORT on global variables. > > Anybody with a Windows build environment want to test the "#define extern" > trick? > > We have details on how to build with Mingw/Msys on Windows on an Amazon VM <http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Building_With_MinGW> which is either free or very cheap. Do I need to give instructions on how to do this for MSVC builds too? It's really not terribly hard. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: