Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 52EFAE6A.1070307@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/03/2014 01:13 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> I'm not a fan of MinGW (gcc) on Windows, it's a right pain. It's also >> the only open source compiler currently supported for PostgreSQL on >> Windows - practically the only one available. I don't know about you, >> but I'm not too keen on assuming Microsoft will continue to offer free >> toolchains that're usable for our purposes. They're crippling their free >> build tools more and more with each release, which isn't a good trend. > I was under the impression that Microsoft had finally come around to > implementing a few C99 features in Visual Studio 2013 precisely > because they want there to be an open source ecosystem on Windows. > > It's not so long ago that they were saying they would no longer publish free-as-in-beer command line compilers at all. The outrage made them change their minds, but we really can't rely on only Microsoft compilers for Windows. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: