Re: AIX shared libraries (was Re: [PATCHES] Fix linking of OpenLDAP libraries)
От | Albe Laurenz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AIX shared libraries (was Re: [PATCHES] Fix linking of OpenLDAP libraries) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 52EF20B2E3209443BC37736D00C3C1380A51744E@EXADV1.host.magwien.gv.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | AIX shared libraries (was Re: [PATCHES] Fix linking of OpenLDAP libraries) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: >> The natural way in AIX would be: >> - Create libpq.so >> - Create libpq.a by 'rm -f libpq.a; ar -rc libpq.a libpq.so' >> - Install only libpq.a > > Hm. This seems possible with some moderate hacking on Makefile.shlib > (certainly it'd be no more invasive than the existing Windows-specific > platform variants). However, looking at what's already in > Makefile.shlib for AIX makes me doubt the above claim a bit, because > AFAICS libpq.so is produced from libpq.a on that platform. Is it > possible that the rules have changed across AIX versions, and that the > code in there now is needful for older versions? I don't think that this behaviour has changed. I remember it from AIX 4.3.2. Of course libpq.so is created from (the static) libpq.a. But once you have the dynamic library, you can link statically against it. > Another issue with installing only .a is that there's no provision > for versioning in .a library names ... what happens to someone who > needs two generations of libpq on his machine? Use different directories and set LIBPATH? I don't know if there is a canonical way to do that. I'll investigate. Yours, Laurenz Albe
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: