Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived
От | Albe Laurenz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 52EF20B2E3209443BC37736D00C3C13809B5B64C@EXADV1.host.magwien.gv.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Forcing current WAL file to be archived (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Tim Allen wrote: >>>Patch included to implement xlog switching, using an xlog record >>>"processing instruction" and forcibly moving xlog pointers. >>> >>>1. Happens automatically on pg_stop_backup() >> >> >> Oh - so it will not be possible to do an online backup >> _without_ forcing a WAL switch any more? > > Well, previously, you would have always had to simulate a wal > switch, by > working out which is the current wal file and copying that. Otherwise > your online backup wouldn't be complete. > > What Simon is describing sounds like a big step forward from that > situation. It should let me delete half the code in my pitr > backup/failover scripts. Definitely a Good Thing. Certainly a Good Thing, and it should be on by default. But couldn't there be situations where you'd like to do an online backup without a WAL switch? To avoid generating an archive WAL every day on a database with few changes, e.g.? Maybe not, I'm just wondering. Laurenz Albe
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: