Re: Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd
От | Marco Atzeri |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 52E20623.1060801@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 24/01/2014 05:28, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > On 01/23/2014 10:50 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:48:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: >>>> Andrew, should this configuration/code patch be applied to 9.4? >>>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/51B59794.3000500@gmail.com >>>> I think we would have to make Cygwin-specific regression output to >>>> handle the regression failures, but frankly I am not even sure if they >>>> are right. >>> Those regression failures certainly say there is something broken in >>> the submitter's build, so this needs to be taken with a grain of salt. >>> I'm not qualified to evaluate the proposed changes, but I wonder why >>> they're needed given that we have successful cygwin builds in the >>> buildfarm. >> Yes, that confuses me too. Unless we get more details, we should ignore >> the patches. Thanks. Andrew, nice to see, the question rises again. I dropped from the pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org some time ago, as no one was following the issue; I just rejoined. As explained here: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-03/msg00217.html http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-03/msg00050.html 1) Using DLLTOOL/DLLWRAP "postgresql dll's allocation table are partially wrong, so they fail at load after a rebase." the build farm can not test this rebase failure, as it will happen after installation at any rebase. DLLTOOL/DLLWRAP usage is "really" deprecated on cygwin as it produces damaged binaries that 2) I am the currently package mantainer for cygwin last I packged was postgresql-9.2.4 9.3.2 is on my TODO list > AFAICT the regression is in Cygwin. The buildfarm passes because it's > using an oldish Cygwin release, 1.7.7 rather than the current 1.7.27. I > have brought the regression the athe attention of the Cygwin people in > the past, but without response. which issue ? During my package tests I have only two issues: tsearch ... FAILED andtest: prepared_xacts must be skipped as it never completes > The build system changes have slipped off my radar, unfortunately. Not > sure when I can get to them. Regars Marco
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: