Re: BUG #8218: Error when querying an JSON data, 9.3beta
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #8218: Error when querying an JSON data, 9.3beta |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 52E1ECD9.6070501@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #8218: Error when querying an JSON data, 9.3beta (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #8218: Error when querying an JSON data, 9.3beta
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 01/23/2014 10:05 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 01:24:26PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> daniel.zlatev@gmail.com writes: >>> CREATE TABLE products ( >>> data JSON >>> ); >>> INSERT INTO products(data) VALUES('{"id": 1, "name": "shoes", "in_stock": 5}'); >>> INSERT INTO products(data) VALUES('[1,2,3,4,5]'); >>> SELECT * FROM products WHERE (data->>'in_stock')::integer > 0 >>> Output was: >>> [Err] ERROR: cannot extract field from a non-object >>> I can understand the reason behind this error(JSON array don't has fields), >>> but for me it is very logical postgres to exclude this row from the >>> returning set, rather to throw an error. >> Hm. In principle we could allow ->> to return NULL rather than failing >> when there's no such field, but I'm not sure that would represent good >> language design. However, this example definitely shows there are some >> holes in the current set of JSON manipulation functions. The only way >> to avoid a failure here would be to write something like >> >> WHERE (CASE WHEN json_has_field(data, 'in_stock') THEN >> (data->>'in_stock')::integer ELSE NULL::integer END) > 0 >> >> but there is no "json_has_field" test function, nor any nice way to >> build one from the provided functions. >> >> It's probably too late to address this for 9.3, but we ought to put it >> on the to-do list for 9.4. > Was this addressed for 9.4 because I don't see it? > 9.4 does have json_typeof(), which should let you construct an adequate test along the lines Tom suggests. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: