Re: proposal, patch: allow multiple plpgsql plugins

Hi Pavel,

First of all, thanks for working on this!

On 1/12/14, 8:58 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I still not happy with plugin_info - it is only per plugin now and should
> be per plugin and per function.

I'm not sure I understand the point of plugin_info in the first place, 
but what would having a separate info per (plugin, function) achieve 
that can't be done otherwise?


As for the current patch, I'd like to see improvements on a few things:
  1) It doesn't currently compile because of extra semicolons in the     PLpgSQL_plugin struct.
  2) The previous comment above the same struct still talk about the     rendezvous variable which is now gone.  The
commentshould be     updated to reflect the new API.
 
  3) The same comment talks about how important it is to unregister a     plugin if its _PG_fini() is ever called, but
thecurrent API does     not support unregistering.  That should probably be added?  I'm not     sure when _PG_fini()
wouldbe called.
 
  4) The comment  /* reserved for use by optional plugin */  seems a bit     weird in its new context.


Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja