Re: Standalone synchronous master

On 01/10/2014 04:38 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Adrian,
>
> * Adrian Klaver (adrian.klaver@gmail.com) wrote:
>> On 01/10/2014 04:25 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>>> * Adrian Klaver (adrian.klaver@gmail.com) wrote:
>>>> A) Change the existing sync mode to allow the master and standby
>>>> fall out of sync should a standby fall over.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure that anyone is argueing for this..
>>
>> Looks like here, unless I am really missing the point:
>
> Elsewhere in the thread, JD agreed that having it as an independent
> option was fine.

Yes. I am fine with an independent option.

JD



-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/  509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary 
act.", George Orwell