Re: Standalone synchronous master
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Standalone synchronous master |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 52D07B6B.4040303@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Standalone synchronous master (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Standalone synchronous master
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/10/2014 02:57 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: > Yes, if you have a BBU that memory is authoritative in most cases. But > in that case the argument of having two disks is pretty much pointless, > the SPOF suddenly became the battery + ram. > > > If that is a concern then use multiple controllers. Certainly not > unheard of- look at SANs... > And in PostgreSQL we obviously have the option of having a third or fourth standby but that isn't the problem we are trying to solve. JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579 PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc "In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act.", George Orwell
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: