Re: new json funcs
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: new json funcs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 52D04026.9060908@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: new json funcs (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: new json funcs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/10/2014 01:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> On 01/10/2014 12:42 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> Is it just me, or is the json_array_element(json, int) function not >>> documented? >> As discussed at the time, we didn't document the functions underlying >> the json operators, just the operators themselves. > I see though that json_array_element has a DESCR comment. I believe > project policy is that if a function is not meant to be invoked by name > but only through an operator, its pg_description entry should just be > "implementation of xyz operator", with the real comment attached only > to the operator. Otherwise \df users are likely to be misled into using > the function when they're not really supposed to; and at the very least > they will bitch about its lack of documentation. > > See commits 94133a935414407920a47d06a6e22734c974c3b8 and > 908ab80286401bb20a519fa7dc7a837631f20369. > > OK, I can fix that I guess. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: