Re: Consistent file-level backup of pg data directory
От | gator_ml@yahoo.de |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Consistent file-level backup of pg data directory |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 52D027D1.8000300@yahoo.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Consistent file-level backup of pg data directory (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Consistent file-level backup of pg data directory
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 01/08/14 19:55, Jeff Janes wrote: > I think it would be easier to just exclude the database from the > system-wide backup and use a different method for it, rather than > engineer the necessary before/after hooks onto the system-wide backup. Thanks for your comments! I really thought, it would be easier (I still have the impression, that almost everything needed to make a filesystem backup safe would be available, only the parts don't fit too well for that purpose). I now came up with a way how to safely get a postgres database into the general backup-procedure: - move the postgres data directory to a separate LVM volume - call pg_start_backup() - create a LVM snapshot - call pg_stop_backup() and update the snapshot's pg_xlog from the "real" volume - create a recovery.conf on the snapshot - run our normal backup procedure with the "real" postgres data volume replaced by the prepared snapshot - remove the snapshot again - If the backup is restored to a machine, postgres will find the recovery.conf file and initiate the recovery Actually, I wonder if in this scenario, the pg_start/stop_backup is really necessary - would it be safe to just tell postgres to create a checkpoint right before the snapshot and directly use the "frozen" data directory in the backup? (The postgres documentation suggests this). Another point in favor of the slightly cumbersome solution above would be the ability to combine it with Point-in-Time Recovery. As far as I understood, this only works with a base backup created using pg_start/stop_backup. Is this right? Regards, Peter
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: