Re: Standalone synchronous master
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Standalone synchronous master |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 52CDD808.5090302@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Standalone synchronous master (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/08/2014 02:49 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Then you don't understand the point of sync mode, and you shouldn't be > using it. The point is *exactly* to refuse to commit transactions unless > we can guarantee the data's been replicated. I understand exactly that and I don't disagree, except in the case where it is going to bring down the master (see my further reply). I now remember arguing about this a few years ago when we started down the sync path. Anyway, perhaps this is just something of a knob that can be turned. We don't have to continue the argument. Thank you for considering what I was saying. Sincerely, JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579 PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc "In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act.", George Orwell
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: