Re: Re: postgresql.org inconsistent (Re: [GENERAL] PG replication across DataCenters)
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: postgresql.org inconsistent (Re: [GENERAL] PG replication across DataCenters) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 52A9E35C.3080203@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgresql.org inconsistent (Re: [GENERAL] PG replication across DataCenters) (Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: postgresql.org inconsistent (Re: [GENERAL] PG
replication across DataCenters)
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
On 12/12/2013 08:18 AM, Wolfgang Keller wrote: > >> 2. Synchronous multi-master configuration > > Now back to the original thread: > >> Knowing the number of forks/projects based on Postgres, maintaining a >> list on a wiki list the one below is just easier for everybody: >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Replication,_Clustering,_and_Connection_Pooling > > That one doesn't even list PostgreSQL-XC. Then update the page? It is a wiki. > > For how man years has it been around now... > Can't even remember any more. > > Instead it lists Postgres-R, which has been in koma for how long now... > Can't even remember any more. Nope, it is actively developed and sponsored by Translattice. > >> Perhaps this list is not completely up-to-date, > > To call that an understatement would be an euphemism. > > It's simply misleading. And misleading potential users in search of > solutions for their needs is *bad* for the PostgreSQL project. Why are you arguing about this instead of just fixing it? > Guys, are you really not aware to *that* point how badly you shoot > yourself (and the PostgreSQL project as a whole) in the foot with that > single - wrong - phrase in the "official" documentation: > > "PostgreSQL does not offer this type of replication" > > Reading that phrase, the average O***** DBA looking for a cheaper > replacement will stop considering PostgreSQL and that's it. You're out > of business. They won't look any further. I agree. > "PostgreSQL itself does not provide this as a built-in functionality at > the current stage, but there is an open-source "fork" freely available > under the same license as PostgreSQL that does, for details read: > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Postgres-XC" > > Is that really too much work? Heck, give me write-authority on the > documentation and I'll do it for you then. You've already wasted *way* Submit a patch. Is that so hard? I don't understand why you are up in arms about this. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579 PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc For my dreams of your image that blossoms a rose in the deeps of my heart. - W.B. Yeats
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: