Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 52A0E583.9020009@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Why we are going to have to go DirectIO (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/05/2013 12:41 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> Actually, I've been able to do 35K TPS on commodity hardware on Ubuntu >> 10.04. I have yet to go about 15K on any Ubuntu running a 3.X Kernel. >> The CPU scheduling on 2.6 just seems to be far better tuned, aside from >> the IO issues; at 35K TPS, the CPU workload is evenly distributed across >> cores, whereas on 3.X it lurches from core to core like a drunk in a >> cathedral. > > Do drunks lurch differently in cathedrals than they do elsewhere? Yeah, beacause they lurch from one column to another. It's a visual metaphor. ;-) -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: