Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 529E5EBD.1060701@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Why we are going to have to go DirectIO (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO
Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/03/2013 12:15 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > We are in no way different and I would like to note that we do not have > any form of sensible performance related regression testing either. > I would even argue that there is ton more regression testing (be it > performance or otherwise) going into the linux kernel (even on a > relative scale) than we do and pointing the finger at something they are > dealing with once noticed. > If we care about our performance on various operating systems it is > _OUR_ responsibility to track that closely and automated and report back > and only if that feedback loop fails to work we are actually in a real > position to consider something as drastical as considering a platform > "undependable" or looking into alternatives (like directIO). Would certainly be nice. Realistically, getting good automated performace tests will require paying someone like Greg S., Mark or me for 6 solid months to develop them, since worthwhile open source performance test platforms currently don't exist. That money has never been available; maybe I should do a kickstarter. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: