Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information

On 11/26/13 15:34, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> What's your plans about GIN now? I tried to rebase packed posting lists
> with head. But I found that you've changed interface of placeToPage
> function. That's conflicts with packed posting lists, because
> dataPlaceToPageLeaf needs not only offset number to describe place to
> insert item pointer. Do you like to commit rework of handling GIN
> incomplete splits before?

Yeah, I'm planning to get back to this patch after committing the 
incomplete splits patch. I think the refactoring of the WAL-logging that 
I did in that patch will simplify this patch, too. I'll take a look at 
Michael's latest comments on the incomplete splits patch tomorrow, so I 
should get back to this on Thursday or Friday.

- Heikki