Re: Postgresql in a Virtual Machine
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgresql in a Virtual Machine |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5294C0C4.1080003@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgresql in a Virtual Machine (Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 11/26/2013 08:51 AM, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: > 2013-11-25 21:19 keltezéssel, Heikki Linnakangas írta: >> On 25.11.2013 22:01, Lee Nguyen wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Having attended a few PGCons, I've always heard the remark from a few >>> presenters and attendees that Postgres shouldn't be run inside a VM. >>> That >>> bare metal is the only way to go. >>> >>> Here at work we were entertaining the idea of running our Postgres >>> database >>> on our VM farm alongside our application vm's. We are planning to >>> run a >>> few Postgres synchronous replication nodes. >>> >>> Why shouldn't we run Postgres in a VM? What are the downsides? Does >>> anyone >>> have any metrics or benchmarks with the latest Postgres? >> >> I've also heard people say that they've seen PostgreSQL to perform >> worse in a VM. In the performance testing that we've done in VMware, >> though, we haven't seen any big impact. So I guess the answer is that >> it depends on the specific configuration of CPU, memory, disks and >> the software. > > We at Cybertec tested some configurations about 2 months ago. > The performance drop is coming from the disk given to the VM guest. > > When there is a dedicated disk (pass through) given to the VM guest, > PostgreSQL runs at a speed of around 98% of the bare metal. > > When the virtual disk is a disk file on the host machine, we've measured > 20% or lower. The host used Fedora 19/x86_64 with IIRC a 3.10.x Linux > kernel > with EXT4 filesystem (this latter is sure, not IIRC). The effect was > observed > both under Qemu/KVM and Xen. > > The virtual disk was not pre-allocated, since it was the default setting, > i.e. space savings preferred over speed. The figure might be better with > a pre-allocated disk but the filesystem journalling done twice (both > in the > host and the guest) will have an effect. Not-pre-allocated disk-file backed is just about the worst case in my experience. Try pre-allocated VirtIO disks on an LVM volume group - you should get much better performance. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: