Re: Postgresql in a Virtual Machine
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgresql in a Virtual Machine |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5294BED4.7080409@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgresql in a Virtual Machine (Craig James <cjames@emolecules.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 11/26/2013 09:26 AM, Craig James wrote: > > On 25.11.2013 22:01, Lee Nguyen wrote: > > > Why shouldn't we run Postgres in a VM? What are the > downsides? Does anyone > have any metrics or benchmarks with the latest Postgres? > > > For those of us with small (a few to a dozen servers), we'd like to > get out of server maintenance completely. Can anyone with experience > on a cloud VM solution comment? Do the VM solutions provided by the > major hosting companies have the same good performance as the VM's > that that several have described here? > > Obviously there's Amazon's new Postgres solution available. What else > is out there in the way of "instant on" solutions with > Linux/Postgres/Apache preconfigured systems? Has anyone used them in > production? > > If you want a full stack including Postgres, Heroku might be your best bet. Depends a bit on your application and your workload. And yes, I've used it. Full disclosure: I have done work paid for by Heroku. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: