Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT
От | Zubkovsky, Sergey |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 528853D3C5ED2C4AA8990B504BA7FB850106DF14@sol.transas.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
The previous results were received on PG 8.3 version: "PostgreSQL 8.3.0, compiled by Visual C++ build 1400" -----Original Message----- From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 7:19 PM To: Zubkovsky, Sergey Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT [ moved to -hackers --- see original thread here http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2008-03/msg00039.php ] "Zubkovsky, Sergey" <Sergey.Zubkovsky@transas.com> writes: > Here is my example. Hmm ... on my Fedora machine I get the same result (704512) in all these cases, which is what I'd expect. (The exact value could vary across platforms, of course.) You said you were using the MinGW build --- maybe MinGW's version of stat(2) isn't trustworthy? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: