Re: backup.sgml-cmd-v003.patch

On 11/08/2013 12:18 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>
> On 11/08/2013 02:12:56 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Joshua D. Drake
>> <jd@commandprompt.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>> superuser privileges; it's the selective-dump case where you can
>> often
>>>>>> get by without them.  I've attached a proposed patch along these
>> lines
>>>>>> for your consideration.
>>>>> That's fair.
>>>> Should I go ahead and apply that portion, then?
>>> I am certainly not opposed.
>>
>> OK, done.
>
> So....  Joshusa/Ivan  Do you want to send another
> version of the patch with the committed changes
> omitted for further review?
>

I have no problem having Ivan submit another patch, outside of the 
multiple patch requirement. If you guys will accept a single patch file 
with the agreed changes, then we are good.

Joshua D. Drake


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/  509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
For my dreams of your image that blossoms   a rose in the deeps of my heart. - W.B. Yeats