Re: CLUSTER FREEZE
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CLUSTER FREEZE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 526AA840.4000205@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | CLUSTER FREEZE (Thomas Munro <munro@ip9.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: CLUSTER FREEZE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/24/2013 07:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > In any case, it's very far from obvious to me that CLUSTER ought > to throw away information by default, which is what you're proposing. The problem here is that you're thinking of the 1/10 of 1% of our users who have a serious PostgreSQL failure and post something on the lists for help, for which XID forensic information is useful. As opposed to the 99.9% of our users for whom deferred freezing is a performance burden. While I realize that the 0.1% of users are more likely to have contact with you, personally, it's still bad policy for the project. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: