Re: PostgreSQL Point In Time Recovery
| От | John R Pierce |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Point In Time Recovery |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5269678A.5070100@hogranch.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL Point In Time Recovery (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL Point In Time Recovery
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On 10/24/2013 9:47 AM, Jeff Janes wrote: > > I restore from my base backup plus WAL quite often. It is how I get a > fresh dev or test instance when I want one. (It is also how I have > confidence that everything is working well and that I know what I'm > doing should the time come to do a real restore). When that starts to > take an annoyingly long time, I run a new base backup. How often that > is, can be anywhere from days to months, depending on what's going on > in the database. hey, silly idea formed on half a cup of coffee.... if that base backup is in the form of a copy of the data directory (as opposed to tar.gz or something), could you 'update' it by pointing an instance of postgres at it, and then playing the WAL archive into it, then shutting that instance down? or would it be impossible to synchronize the ongoing new WAL's from the master with the timeline of this? -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: